From: Jacques Gelinas (jack_at_solucorp.qc.ca)
Date: Wed Jan 09 2002 - 09:03:37 EST
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 20:37:50 -0500, Gil Vidals wrote
> Hi,
>
> That doesn't make sense to me at all. If my goal is to host 250
> VServers, then I'm in big trouble if the smallest install is
> 270MB. That would be 50GB and that doesn't include the user
> files!
>
> I was thinking that a basic install could be 20 MB. Is that
> possible? I'll start building basic installs and see how small I
> can get it, but there must be somebody out there who already has
> this down pat and knows what is the smallest practical size
> install for Vservers with typical functionality (based on RH
> 7.2).
It is possible to create a very small vserver foot print by installing
only the necessary package, but when unification enter, it is not
that useful and get more difficult to use. While you may have the strick minimum
in a server, you often need an extra tool to complete an admin task. Having
all onboard is helpful.
---------------------------------------------------------
Jacques Gelinas <jack_at_solucorp.qc.ca>
vserver: run general purpose virtual servers on one box, full speed!
http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 19 2002 - 12:01:00 EDT