re: [vserver] That ctx-9 bug

From: Jacques Gelinas (jack_at_solucorp.qc.ca)
Date: Wed Apr 03 2002 - 16:55:38 EST

• Next message: Jacques Gelinas: "RE: [vserver] Kernel locks"
• Previous message: James MacLean: "[vserver] ctx-9 minus one line of patch runs longer"
• Maybe in reply to: James MacLean: "[vserver] That ctx-9 bug"
• Next in thread: edward_at_paradigm4.com.au: "re: [vserver] That ctx-9 bug"

On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 11:17:19 -0500, James MacLean wrote
> Just curious if there is any use to porting the CTX patches to the
> User-Mode Linux code and seeing if one could break it in there?
>
> Or would it even work under UML?

Possible. Oddly, many have touted UML as a way to create virtual servers.

Anyway, someone found the problem and ctx-10 is on it way

---------------------------------------------------------
Jacques Gelinas <jack_at_solucorp.qc.ca>
vserver: run general purpose virtual servers on one box, full speed!
http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc

• Next message: Jacques Gelinas: "RE: [vserver] Kernel locks"
• Previous message: James MacLean: "[vserver] ctx-9 minus one line of patch runs longer"
• Maybe in reply to: James MacLean: "[vserver] That ctx-9 bug"
• Next in thread: edward_at_paradigm4.com.au: "re: [vserver] That ctx-9 bug"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 19 2002 - 12:01:01 EDT