From: B612_at_DigitalAngel.com.au
Date: Wed Feb 20 2002 - 20:06:03 EST
How would you feel if I took Rik van Riel's patches
http://surriel.com/patches/2.3/2.3.99-3-schedpatch3
http://surriel.com/patches/2.2.15-fairsched
and adapted them for the latest kernel + vserver?
Would you be interested?
I am going to include this as an option in the next 2.2.20 ctx patch that I'm maintaining
as I'm still not happy with the current scheduler.
I'm also going to try adapting the 'large-nice' patch:
http://surriel.com/patches/2.4/2.4.3ac4-largenice
as yet another kernel compile-time option.
Ed
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 13:37:36 -0500, edward_at_DigitalAngel.com.au wrote
> > Excellent.
> >
> > I already dug out some message from a while ago
> > to do with the scheduler changes and I have a question.
> >
> > Did the scheduling code of vserver get changed since then?
> > The latest CTX-7 patch still appears to be messing with goodness()
>
> Yes nothing was changed in this area. Someone told me he was working
> on a different solution. Can't remember who.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Jacques Gelinas <jack_at_solucorp.qc.ca>
> vserver: run general purpose virtual servers on one box, full speed!
> http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 19 2002 - 12:01:01 EDT